This commercial intended for German television has it all: checkerboard patterns everywhere, transhumanism, deshumanization, mind control, alter-personalities, Marilyn Monroe (the original Monarch sex kitten), the colors white, black and red, etc.

Katy Perry’s Illuminati, MK-Ultra Commercial
By Vigilant | September 4th, 2010 | Category: Latest News | 10 comments

This commercial intended for German television has it all: checkerboard patterns everywhere, transhumanism, deshumanization, mind control, alter-personalities, Marilyn Monroe (the original Monarch sex kitten), the colors white, black and red, etc.

“We love to entertain you”. In other words, this is the kind the stuff that is supposed to entertain you.

MTV.com published an article about the ad and here’s an excerpt:

“Katy Perry comes to life, channeling a futuristic Marilyn Monroe in a red dress that mimics the iconic white one in “The Seven Year Itch.” The singer then transforms into a 1960s housewife with a polka-dot geometric dress. But with a blink of an eye, that look is gone in favor of a superhero-gone-sex-kitten look. Riding a flaring rocket that floats before a building window, Perry shoots into the city lights before doing her spokesperson drop: “We love to entertain you.”
– MTV.com, Katy Perry Goes Futuristic In ‘Teenage Dream’ German TV Spot

Did MTV actually use the term sex kitten?

ARTICLE SOURCE: Vigilant Citizen

An illusion it will be, so large, so vast it will escape their perception.

Those who will see it will be thought of as insane.

We will create separate fronts to prevent them from seeing the connection between us.

We will behave as if we are not connected to keep the illusion alive. Our goal will be accomplished one drop at a time so as to never bring suspicion upon ourselves. This will also prevent them from seeing the changes as they occur.

We will always stand above the relative field of their experience for we know the secrets of the absolute.

We will work together always and will remain bound by blood and secrecy. Death will come to he who speaks.

We will keep their lifespan short and their minds weak while pretending to do the opposite.

We will use our knowledge of science and technology in subtle ways so they will never see what is happening.

We will use soft metals, aging accelerators and sedatives in food and water, also in the air.

They will be blanketed by poisons everywhere they turn.

The soft metals will cause them to lose their minds. We will promise to find a cure from our many fronts, yet we will feed them more poison.

The poisons will be absorbed trough their skin and mouths, they will destroy their minds and reproductive systems.

From all this, their children will be born dead, and we will conceal this information.

The poisons will be hidden in everything that surrounds them, in what they drink, eat, breathe and wear.

We must be ingenious in dispensing the poisons for they can see far.

We will teach them that the poisons are good, with fun images and musical tones.

Those they look up to will help. We will enlist them to push our poisons.

They will see our products being used in film and will grow accustomed to them and will never know their true effect.

When they give birth we will inject poisons into the blood of their children and convince them its for their help.

We will start early on, when their minds are young, we will target their children with what children love most, sweet things.

When their teeth decay we will fill them with metals that will kill their mind and steal their future.

When their ability to learn has been affected, we will create medicine that will make them sicker and cause other diseases for which we will create yet more medicine.

We will render them docile and weak before us by our power.

They will grow depressed, slow and obese, and when they come to us for help, we will give them more poison.

We will focus their attention toward money and material goods so they many never connect with their inner self. We will distract them with fornication, external pleasures and games so they may
never be one with the oneness of it all.

Their minds will belong to us and they will do as we say. If they refuse we shall find ways to implement mind-altering technology into their lives.

We will use fear as our weapon.

We will establish their governments and establish opposites within. We will own both sides.

We will always hide our objective but carry out our plan.

They will perform the labor for us and we shall prosper from their toil.

Our families will never mix with theirs. Our blood must be pure always, for it is the way.

We will make them kill each other when it suits us.

We will keep them separated from the oneness by dogma and religion.

We will control all aspects of their lives and tell them what to think and how.

We will guide them kindly and gently letting them think they are guiding themselves.

We will foment animosity between them through our factions.

When a light shall shine among them, we shall extinguish it by ridicule, or death, whichever suits us best.

We will make them rip each other’s hearts apart and kill their own children.

We will accomplish this by using hate as our ally, anger as our friend.

The hate will blind them totally, and never shall they see that from their conflicts we emerge as their rulers. They will be busy killing each other.

They will bathe in their own blood and kill their neighbors for as long as we see fit.

We will benefit greatly from this, for they will not see us, for they cannot see us.

We will continue to prosper from their wars and their deaths.

We shall repeat this over and over until our ultimate goal is accomplished.

We will continue to make them live in fear and anger though images and sounds.

We will use all the tools we have to accomplish this.

The tools will be provided by their labor.

We will make them hate themselves and their neighbors.

We will always hide the divine truth from them, that we are all one. This they must never know!

They must never know that color is an illusion, they must always think they are not equal.

Drop by drop, drop by drop we will advance our goal.

We will take over their land, resources and wealth to exercise total control over them.

We will deceive them into accepting laws that will steal the little freedom they will have.

We will establish a money system that will imprison them forever, keeping them and their children in debt.

When they shall ban together, we shall accuse them of crimes and present a different story to the world for we shall own all the media.

We will use our media to control the flow of information and their sentiment in our favor.

When they shall rise up against us we will crush them like insects, for they are less than that.

They will be helpless to do anything for they will have no weapons.

We will recruit some of their own to carry out our plans, we will promise them eternal life, but eternal life they will never have for they are not of us.

The recruits will be called “initiates” and will be indoctrinated to believe false rites of passage to higher realms. Members of these groups will think they are one with us never knowing the truth.
They must never learn this truth for they will turn against us.

For their work they will be rewarded with earthly things and great titles, but never will they become immortal and join us, never will they receive the light and travel the stars.

They will never reach the higher realms, for the killing of their own kind will prevent passage to the realm of enlightenment. This they will never know.

The truth will be hidden in their face, so close they will not be able to focus on it until its too late.

Oh yes, so grand the illusion of freedom will be, that they will never know they are our slaves.

When all is in place, the reality we will have created for them will own them. This reality will be their prison. They will live in self-delusion.

When our goal is accomplished a new era of domination will begin.

Their minds will be bound by their beliefs, the beliefs we have established from time immemorial.

But if they ever find out they are our equal, we shall perish then. THIS THEY MUST NEVER KNOW.

If they ever find out that together they can vanquish us, they will take action.

They must never, ever find out what we have done, for if they do, we shall have no place to run, for it will be easy to see who we are once the veil has fallen. Our actions will have revealed who we are and they will hunt us down and no person shall give us shelter.

This is the secret covenant by which we shall live the rest of our present and future lives, for this reality will transcend many generations and life spans.

This covenant is sealed by blood, our blood. We, the ones who from heaven to earth came.

This covenant must NEVER, EVER be known to exist. It must NEVER, EVER be written or spoken of for if it is, the consciousness it will spawn will release the fury of the PRIME CREATOR upon us and we shall be cast to the depths from whence we came and remain there until the end time of infinity itself.

This is a prime example of how we are being manipulated thru the occult practioners, the media and government.

In this Serta commercial there is obviously much, much more than meets the eye upon a casual view. Its imperative to pay particular attention to the numbers of the sheep. The 9 and 11 sheep were placed on pedestals which is representative of the 2 towers.
Other things to take note of include:
The blue eyes of the sheep, sheep do not have blue eyes. Sheep like many minorities or non aryan races have brown eyes.

The funny thing is, in this different Serta commercial the sheeps eyes are brown. Except for the lead sheep. Which change from blue to brown depending on the ad campaign.

Serta’s crescent moon logo, this could possibly be a referrence to Islam.
Lilies on the table @ 0:24 – lilies are in many cultures a symbol of life and death.

“Save Now” under the lilies = a message to tell those in the know that “Now” is the time that your actions would determine your “Saving”/”salvation” (life or death)

The black label hanging off the bed at 0:24 = black flag = death
The candle & mirror at 0:24 = occult/witchcraft/spells/etc

A FEW QUOTES FROM THE COMMERCIAL

What is a sheep born to do ?

Provide wool meaning to “Pull the wool over your eyes?”

Yeah, “Looking good, No. 9, looking good.”

The the sheep goes,

“Where is your dignity?”

I’m sure that is just blatant code. Someone is giving the OK for a certain date – or something else. Remember the Illuminati feel exonerated of any guilt if they feel like they have pre-warned the world about what they are about to do. It would be interesting to have a look at advertisement in 2001 leading up to the twin towers tragedy.

This Sept. 11 will be exactly 9 years since the towers came down.

From the Serta site. a bio of #1 sheep:

Serta Sheep #1—The Leader of the Flock
The boss of the Serta Counting Sheep. #1 instigates all anti-Serta activity. Clever, determined, and afraid of no one. he devises scheme after scheme to thwart Serta’s mission to provide a good night’s sleep to all. No one Is sure where #1 came from. Other Serta sheep recall him simply showing up one day and organizing the ongoing rebellion. “He was mesmerizing.” says #9, “I remember the day he came to us. We were all just standing around right next to each other eating grass. A few of the ewes fell in love with him. I mean, they took one look at him and the cud Just fell right out of their mouths.”
Not only Is he charismatic and persuasive. #1 is an endless source of ideas. From blackmail to dirty tricks, he is relentless In his determination to put his flock back to work, doing what they were born to do… be counted by the sleepless.

Serta Sheep #1 Stats
• Origins unknown: believed to be from the Upper Midwest, possibly Detroit area
• Types 65 WPM (with snout)
• Is believed to have military experience; often requests meetings at “Oh-elght-hundred hours.” etc.
• Becomes uncharacteristically docile while being shorn
• Is afraid of thunder

This sounds more like an intelligence agency’s dossier on a subject they are monitoring.
And who is the God of thunder ? Thor
Also get this…
Anthrax is a disease bourne by sheep; anthrax is also a powder; anthrax is the 5th biblical plague; anthrax is a bio weapon. The sheep have a “bio”.

ARTICLE: GLP

A nice example of “predictive programming”

Last week, as the rain lashed outside, my daughter and I settled down for an afternoon of family nostalgia. The type that Walt Disney films excel at.

The kind that has given Disney a special position in our house. To us, the brand suggests a world of family values and bygone traditions. A place where, no matter the adversity faced, good WILL triumph over evil.

Disney films speak to our heart and embroider the lives of our children with a sense of security in an uncertain world.

So it was, this rain-soaked day, we laughed and cried our way through a hat trick of Disney favourites: the heart-rendingly beautiful Bambi, the gloriously regal Lion King and the eternally charming Finding Nemo.

But later, I realised something else that binds Disney films, other than good old nostalgic charm: an absence of parents.

Bambi, abandoned by his father before birth, experiences the hunting and subsequent shooting of his mummy. A tragedy that still reduces me to uncontrollable sobs four decades after I first saw it with my own mother.

That’s not all. In the Lion King, Simba is implicated in the death of his father and runs away in a vain attempt to escape his misery.

While Nemo – the rebellious fish – is the sole survivor of a violent barracuda attack on his mother and siblings and spends much of the story estranged from his father.

The realisation that these three films all drew on a parent-less theme made me reel. Surely it was only coincidence?

Apparently not. For Disney, that most child-friendly of organisations, appears to have something of a parent problem.

Since its formation in the Twenties, Disney’s output has featured a steady supply of dysfunctional and broken families.

Orphan: Mowgli in the care of Baloo in the Disney film The Jungle Book 2

Dumbo, like Bambi, still devastates audiences, as the fatherless baby elephant is separated from his mother after she is locked up for her apparent psychosis.

The moggies in the Aristocats – a personal childhood favourite – are also fatherless. Neither Ariel (The Little Mermaid) or Belle (Beauty And The Beast) have a mother.

Even more recently, fans worldwide have delighted in the final instalment of Toy Story, as Andy – the film’s main character – is raised by a single parent mother.

Not to worry, though, in the total absence of his father, Andy’s key male influence is a wooden cowboy.

And it’s not just Disney’s cartoon output that is subject to this parental peculiarity; its non-animation TV shows and movies are, too.

On Disney’s TV channel, the popular Hannah Montana – played by the precocious Miley Cyrus – learns the teenage ropes from her single parent father because her mother is AWOL.

On the big screen, The Game Plan chronicles a ten-year-old girl searching for her long-lost father after the untimely – although not entirely unpredictable – demise of her single parent mother.

And the Grammy- nominated Enchanted captures Giselle, an archetypal Disney princess, adapting to the harsh environment of New York as a motherless young girl.

By this point in my research, I was becoming increasingly disturbed by the absence of parental role models in the world of Walt Disney. And there was more.

Some Disney characters aren’t even fortunate enough to have one parent and are orphaned before the opening credits are over.

Baby Tarzan was abandoned in the jungle after the savaging of his parents by a leopard. And there’s Tod in The Fox And The Hound and Arthur in The Sword In The Stone, who are left to pursue their destinies without parents.

Fatherless: Dumbo devastates the audience when he becomes separated from his mother in the 1941 hit.

I wonder, is this distinct lack of parental care in Disney productions used for dramatic effect?

Is it there to give the main protagonist an opportunity to face their personal challenges without the guidance of a parent – or is there more to this?

Might the death of Walt Disney’s mother – and the lifelong guilt this left her son with – be the catalyst for the death of parents in Disney?

In 1938 and riding high with the proceeds from his first big screen movie Sleeping Beauty, Walt bought his mother, Flora, and his father, Elias, a house in LA as a golden wedding anniversary present.

Within days of moving in, Flora complained about the stultifying temperatures coming from the central heating boiler and her doting son arranged for a swift replacement.

Days later, Flora died from asphyxiation caused by the new, poorly-installed, boiler.

Might Walt Disney’s misplaced guilt over his mother’s death have led him to airbrush parents – mothers in particular – out of his works?

And has that motivation, after his death in 1966, become a Disney blueprint?

Certainly, it would explain the types of folk stories and fairytales that Disney has acquired for adaptation, even when there are numerous other traditional tales that feature a mother and father.

The company animated Cinderella (no mother), Snow White (no mother or father, but a wicked stepmum) and The Jungle Book (orphaned Mowgli, raised by a bear and a tiger).

But perhaps most audacious in this regard was the purchase of J.M. Barrie’s epic Peter Pan, where the boy-child not only had responsibility for a whole island of orphans (The Lost Boys) but Wendy’s parents socialised constantly and left their children in the care of the family dog.

There is a third way to explain Disney’s apparent downer on parents.

Might the company – and its output – be a true reflection of our disparate society and the obvious disintegration of the traditional nuclear family?

Or might it be the other way around? Might Disney have played its own part in the demise of family values given that we – and our children – have fallen for this wholesome entertainment for decades?

Have we subconsciously imbibed this airbrushing out of parental figures from its films?

If nothing else, Disney stands accused of failing to honour that most sacred of bonds – that of the mother and the father to their children.

Now, that is hardly family entertainment, is it ?

ARTICLE SOURCE: Daily Mail via Vigilante Citizen

The pyramid and the all-seeing eye. An ancient occult symbol that shows up in religion, churches, Egypt, alchemy, on money, artwork, logos, crop circles, business models, architecture, food, pharma, government and fraternal organizations. Why? This symbol has been a great catalyst for philosophical, religious and political debate. Watch as we trace the pyramid and eye throughout history from Ancient Egypt and Sumer, leading up to the Masons and pop-culture of today. Then, we ask movie goers at the 33rd Gothenburg International Film Festival why this symbol is showing up in Hollywood movies again and again. With all the big film budgets and creative teams available, why the constant use of the pyramid and eye? Let’s explore the origins, possible meaning and purpose behind the pyramid and the eye symbolism, for some of us, a symbol we see everyday.

The United States was able to defeat Nazi Germany and helped bring down the USSR, but is the U.S. government now quickly becoming just like them? Once upon a time, America was the land of the free and the home of the brave, but today the government has become an oppressive monster that is intrusively embedding itself in our lives in thousands of different ways. Today we are all viewed as potential threats to the “system” that the government has imposed, and therefore everything that we do must be watched, tracked, traced, recorded and controlled. Lip service is still given to ideals such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, freedom of religion and freedom of movement, but all of those freedoms are rapidly dying a brutal death. To our forefathers, living the American Dream meant living as free men and women, but today it means living under deep socialist tyranny where the government takes care of us from the cradle to the grave and uses an increasingly oppressive Big Brother police state control system to guarantee our safety.

The following are 20 signs that America is no longer the land of the free….

1 – Government trash snooping has now come to America. The city of Cleveland plans to sort through curbside trash to ensure that people are actually recycling their trash. If it is discovered that they are not recycling properly they will be hit with very large fines.

2- It is becoming increasingly difficult to express free speech online. The city of Philadelphia is actually forcing bloggers to pay them $300 for a business license. In this economic climate, who can afford to pay an extra 300 dollars just to have a blog? So much for free speech in Philadelphia.

3 – All of our DNA will soon be in a database. Barack Obama has been pushing a plan to create a national database that will store the DNA of all individuals who have been arrested, even if they end up not being convicted of a crime.

4 - You should consider nothing you do on the Internet to be private. It is being reported that the Obama administration is now demanding access to all Internet records of all Americans without court review.

5 – Just about anything can be used against you in court these days. In one of the very first military commissions held under the Obama administration, a U.S. military judge ruled that confessions obtained by threatening the subject with rape are admissible in court.

6 - But it is not just Islamic terrorists that are going to get this kind of treatment. According to FBI Director Robert Mueller, “homegrown terrorists” represent just as much of a threat to American national security as al-Qaeda does in 2010.

7 - Be very, very careful about what you post on the Internet from now on. One software company is actually developing software which will be able to identify people from photographs posted on the Internet.

8 - The frightening thing is that the Internet may actually be literally inside the heads of many Americans soon. Intel has stated that it wants microchips inside the heads of their customers by the year 2020.

9- As technology develops, it is inevitable that the government will want to utilize it to track us and to control us. A startup company developing “chipless RFID ink” has already tested its product on cattle and laboratory rats. How soon before it starts getting used on humans?

10- “Pre-crime” is not just for science fiction movies any longer. The Florida State Department of Juvenile Justice has announced that it will begin using analysis software to predict crime by young delinquents and will place “potential offenders” in specific prevention and education programs.

11- Are you ready to start carrying a national ID card? This year U.S. Senators Chuck Schumer and Lindsey Graham have been promoting legislation that would institute a biometric national identification card for all Americans.

12 - These days anyone can be labeled a “terrorist” and denied even the most basic of rights. New legislation being pushed by U.S. Senators John McCain and Joe Lieberman earlier this year would allow the U.S. military to round up large numbers of Americans and detain them indefinitely without a trial if they are believed to “pose a threat” or if they have “potential intelligence value” or for any other reason that the President of the United States “considers appropriate”.

13 - The relationship between the police and the public has fundamentally changed. Once upon a time the police were there to protect and serve. But in 2010 police all too often abuse their positions. Just recently, a 32 year old man was beaten black and blue by two Denver Police officers for no apparent reason at all.

14 – We are now so tightly regulated that we can’t even honor good police officers any longer. Memorial crosses erected along Utah public roads to honor fallen state highway troopers have been found unconstitutional by a federal appeals court and must be removed.

15 - In 2010, it seems like the government wants to investigate just about everyone and everything. For example, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi recently called for opponents of the proposed Ground Zero mosque to be investigated in order to establish who is funding their activities.

16 - The truth is that it is very dangerous to exercise your free speech in America in 2010. For example, Christians are being arrested in various areas across the United States for quietly passing out Christian literature on public sidewalks.

17 - The U.S. government has become so paranoid that now even milk is viewed as a major threat. Organic milk is now considered such a national crisis that the FDA has been conducting military style raids on Amish farmers in the state of Pennsylvania.

18 - We can’t even get on an airplane now without first allowing gawking security officials to get a good look at our naked bodies. The new full body security scanners going into airports all across the United States can actually see through clothing and produce very clear and very detailed images of the exposed bodies of everyone who walks through them.

19 - But the government would never save any of those naked images, would they? Well, the U.S. Marshals Service confessed recently that it had indeed saved tens of thousands of images recorded with a millimeter wave system at the security checkpoint of one Florida courthouse.

20 – Things have gotten so bad that we can’t even sing the national anthem during a visit to a national monument any longer. A group of high school students made national headlines recently when they revealed that they were ordered by a security guard to stop singing the national anthem during a visit to the Lincoln Memorial.

ARTICLE SOURCE: End of the American Dream.com

Is it just more ramping up of our collective unconscious fear ? Why do the PTB keep shock-testing us with weird movies, feigned pandemics and set-up scandals and outrages of the moment ?
Pay very close attention to TV, they ALWAYS warn in plain sight in advance.

Black president
Airline terrorism
Mysterious disappearances
Impending doom

Think of it like this, the Illuminati are like Vampires, they have to trick their way into your homes. They cant just kick in your door its against their code.
When you see these types of movies (especially on TV), something similar is soon to happen. Be on guard this is predictive programming at its peak.
If you doubt me, when this series airs…pay even closer attention to the symbols in each scene.

Tonite I decided to watch the movie release “THE EXPERIMENT” which is based on the actual events of a 1971 Stanford university prison experiment. Keeping in mind as in most movies, dramatic liberties were scripted in to the film but for the most part it still hammered out the message.

Also something I noted were the producers of this film. Natural Selection Productions which show various wild animals engaging in fierce predatory behavior in the films opening scenes. Its a very ominous tone that sets underscores the rest of the movie.

You can watch it by clicking the poster image below.

While this version (as previously mentioned) lacks many of the actual events that unfolded, the similarities of Abu Ghraib are hard not to notice.

THE TRUE 1971 STANFORD PRISON EXPERIMENT

In 1971, psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues set out to create an experiment that looked at the impact of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. Zimbardo, a former classmate of Stanley Milgram (who is best-known for his famous obedience experiment, was interested in expanding upon Milgram’s research. He wanted to further investigate the the impact of situational variables on human behavior.

The question the researchers asked was how would the participants react when placed in a simulated prison environment. “Suppose you had only kids who were normally healthy, psychologically and physically, and they knew they would be going into a prison-like environment and that some of their civil rights would be sacrificed. Would those good people, put in that bad, evil place—would their goodness triumph?” Zimbardo explained in one interview.

The Participants

The researchers set up a mock prison in the basement of Standford University’s psychology building, and then selected 24 undergraduate students to play the roles of both prisoners and guards. The participants were selected from a larger group of 70 volunteers because they had no criminal background, lacked psychological issues and had no major medical conditions. The volunteers agreed to participate for a one- to two-week period in exchange for $15 a day.

The Setting and Procedures

The simulated prison included three six by nine foot prison cells. Each cell held three prisoners and included three cots. Other rooms across from the cells were utilized for the prison guards and warden. One very small space was designated as the solitary confinement room, and yet another small room served as the prison yard.

The 24 volunteers were then randomly assigned to either the prisoner group or the guard group. Prisoners were to remain in the mock prison 24-hours a day for the duration of the study. Guards, on the other hand, were assigned to work in three-man teams for eight-hour shifts. After each shift, guards were allowed to return to their homes until their next shift. Researchers were able to observe the behavior of the prisoners and guards using hidden cameras and microphones.
Results of the Stanford Prison Experiment

While the Stanford Prison Experiment was originally slated to last 14 days, it had to be stopped after just six days due to what was happening to the student participants. The guards became abusive and the prisoners began to show signs of extreme stress and anxiety.

While the prisoners and guards were allowed to interact in any way they wanted, the interactions were generally hostile or even dehumanizing. The guards began to behave in ways that were aggressive and abusive toward the prisoners, while the prisoners became passive and depressed. Five of the prisoners began to experience such severe negative emotions, including crying and acute anxiety, that they had to be released from the study early.

Even the researchers themselves began to lose sight of the reality of the situation. Zimbardo, who acted as the prison warden, overlooked the abusive behavior of the prison guards until graduate student Christina Maslach voiced objections to the conditions in the simulated prison and the morality of continuing the experiment.

“Only a few people were able to resist the situational temptations to yield to power and dominance while maintaining some semblance of morality and decency; obviously I was not among that noble class,” Zimbardo later wrote in his book The Lucifer Effect.
What Do the Results of the Stanford Prison Experiment Mean?

According to Zimbardo and his colleagues, the Stanford Prison Experiment demonstrates the powerful role that the situation can play in human behavior. Because the guards were placed in a position of power, they began to behave in ways they would not normally act in their everyday lives or in other situations. The prisoners, placed in a situation where they had no real control, became passive and depressed.

Criticisms of the Stanford Prison Experiment

The Stanford Prison Experiment is frequently cited as an example of unethical research. The experiment could not be replicated by researchers today because it fails to meet the standards established by numerous ethical codes, including the Ethics Code of the American Psychological Association. Zimbardo acknowledges the ethical problems with the study, suggesting that “although we ended the study a week earlier than planned, we did not end it soon enough.”

Other critics suggest that the study lacks generalizability due to a variety of factors. The unrepresentative sample of participants (mostly white and middle class males) makes it difficult to apply the results to a wider population.

The study is also criticized for its lack of ecological validity. While the researchers did their best to recreate a prison setting, it is simply not possible to perfectly mimic all of the environmental and situational variables of prison life.

Despite some of the criticism, the Stanford Prison Experiment remains an important study in our understanding of how the situation can influence human behavior. The study recently garnered attention after reports of the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuses in Iraq became known. Many people, including Zimbardo himself, suggest that the abuses at Abu Ghraib might be real-world examples of the same results observed in Zimbardo’s experiment.

THIS IS THE REAL STORY

Although many of you will object to this, those with keen eyes know that the symbolism of the All Seeing Eye is literally everywhere. This is no question. The real question is why ? Is it just a cruel joke by unassociated individuals to mess with the heads of conspiracy theorists? The way I see it is that these symbols are used today as marks of ownership as well as to mark things that contain symbolic significance containing a message. The elite are not so careless as to mark their innermost texts with these symbols. However, some things, such as logos, are marked with these symbols. The focus of this writing will be on the All Seeing Eye. First I will explain some of the meaning behind the All Seeing Eye.

The All Seeing Eye is a symbol comprised of an eye within a triangle. Often light is shining down from the eye. It is called in Freemasonry the Eye of the Great Architect. There are two explanations to the symbol of the eye. The first is that some believe the eye to be the Eye of Ra, an ancient Egyptian sun deity who is also a manifestation of the god Amen [Amun], known as The Hidden One. The other explanation for the eye is that it is the Eye of Horus, which I find a bit more interesting.

Horus, also originally a Sun Deity, later became attributed with being a sky/duality deity, representing both the Sun and the Moon, with his right eye representing the Sun, again called the Eye of Ra, and the left eye representing the Moon, called the Eye of Tehuti. Interestingly, Tehuti is also known as Thoth, who in occult circles is known as Thoth Hermes Trismegistus, or the Thrice Greatest. He is also known as Hermes to the Greek. Thoth Hermes Trismegistus is a knowledge bringer [Luciferian/Promethean] deity accredited with divulging the divine sciences of Alchemy, Astrology, and Theurgy to humanity. Some also credit him with mathematics, language, among other things. In the esoteric view, Thoth Hermes Trismegistus is believed to have been at one time an actual person who was eventually deified…

The All Seeing Eye usually features a LEFT EYE.

But first of all, DO these symbols actually appear on things tied to the elite ? The answer is yes.. but is it all just coincidence ?
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS COINCIDENCE !

1) The Information Awareness Office logo:

Funded by DARPA, the Information Awareness Office’s stated goal was to collect as much information on everyone and everything as possible. This drew much flack to them and the IAO was discontinued. However, its core projects still continue under different names. The logo depicts the Illuminati pyramid with All Seeing Eye shining its light over a globe.

2) The MI5 Logo. Military Intelligence Section 5.

3) Fidelity Investments Logo:

4) AOL logo:

However, what is more interesting is that these symbols are all over popular media since as early as the 60s and 70s in very hidden and yet deliberate places. So either all these different artists/people are purposefully putting in these symbols just to mess with conspiracy theorists, or there is some greater power at work:

4) For example, here is Madonna bearing the symbol on her back. The name Madonna also has obvious esoteric significance:

5) All Seeing Eye flashed in Nickelodeon logo, along with CBS logo type eyes. If they are just putting it in to mess with the minds of conspiracy theorists, why would they put it here ? How many conspiracy theorists watch Nickelodeon, and why was it flashed quickly as if it were a subliminal ? [note this is back in the 90s]:

6) Michael Jackson’s Dangerous album cover contains the All Seeing Eye as well as the Skull and Crossbones. It is a goldmine of occult symbolism.

Some people believe that Michael Jackson was actually killed by the Illuminati and had been subjected to character assassination in the years prior. This is due to a recent comment by Michael Jackson about a year ago speaking out about the Illuminati, hinting that he was going to utilize his then upcoming “come back” world tour to spread his message and awareness, particularly with a song called “They don’t care about us.” The music video for the song depicts a rural third world country where Michael is dancing with the people, while UN Peacekeeper looking people stand by monotonously giving a fascist presence. In one scene, Michael is seen dancing next to an all-seeing eye that is painted on the wall.

7) Here is recent pop sensation Lady Gaga. Her backup dancers bear the All Seeing Eye symbol on their backs:

Now Lady Gaga is an interesting character. As we all know, music, television, etc.. all influence people in large and yet subtle ways. Lady Gaga’s musical message is one of emptying thoughts and acting as one feels, exemplified by her song Just Dance. It is basically Orwell’s concept of Bellyfeel from 1984. She is often shown speaking in a robotic manner, or acting as if she were mind controlled. Whether or not this is just her public persona it is definitely interesting. She is also often seen with butterfly symbolism, which is a direct reference to MONARCH Programming.. but there’s more.

The word “gaga” roughly means a sort of astonished stupor, for example “he was gaga over that girl.” It is also a direct reference to the Queen song, Radio Gaga. In the music video for Radio Gaga, many scenes from the 1927 movie Metropolis was used. The movie Metropolis is about a woman who is chosen by a futuristic scientist to be “sacrificed” in a black magic/scientific ritual in order to give life to a robot. The experiment is a success and the now alive robot also proved to be very popular among the people. Then the scientist in the movie utilized the public adoration of the robot with the aim of manipulating the public into doing his bidding. His goal was to cause the public to destroy themselves [they end up unwittingly killing their own children and destroying their city].

Lady Gaga’s symbol is that of a headless mannequin with a lightning bolt through it. This of course symbolizes a body which is charged with some sort of outside force that moves it. Mind control themes are often referenced in her songs, which also contain many other occult symbols such as that of associating her with Baphomet, a hermaphroditic goat-headed and winged deity representing the dualistic principles “as above so below” and “order out of chaos.” She is also rumored to be a hermaphrodite herself.

Another thing of interest is that she had an entire photo-shoot in a Masonic Temple, in which she had eyes painted onto her eyelids and took the series of photos with her eyes closed. The esoteric significance of this symbolism is obvious.

Credit Vigilant Citizen for much of the Lady Gaga info, you can check it out HERE

In mainstream rap/hip-hop:

90s rapper Tupac was very vocal about speaking out against the Illuminati. He once said in one of his songs called They Don’t Give A # About Us [Michael Jackson's They Don't Care About Us comes to mind], “some say they expect Illuminati take my body to sleep”

Another line used is “Illuminati want my mind soul and my body.” [Also used by Prodigy]

Another rapper, called Prodigy, of the 90s group Mobb Deep, wrote letters from prison condemning popular mainstream rappers Jay-Z and Kanye West, among others, for selling out to the Illuminati and knowingly selling their message. Originally, rap was a means for the black community to speak out against the wrongs in society. Now, rap has turned into a commercial venture selling the message of get money, get drugs and get bitches, often dropping direct product placement.

Prodigy’s letters also speak out against the banking system among other things. Here is one of such letters:

9) Rapper Jay-Z
As mentioned before, owns a record company called Roc-A-Fella records, a direct reference to Rockefeller. He is considered the one who benefited the most from the deaths of Tupac and Biggie in 96 and 97 respectively. Jay-Z came onto the scene and out of obscurity in 95-96 and was drastically less talented than either Tupac or Biggie, who rapped about the ills of society. With their deaths, he was propelled directly to the top with the help of the invisible hand of MTV.

One symbol that Jay-Z uses to represent himself and his company is called the Roc. It consists of two hands forming a triangular shape and then being placed in front of the left eye:

Jay-Z is also known to be a Freemason, and has been pictured giving rapper Kanye West, also signed under Roc-A-Fella Records and also a Freemason, a Freemason handshake.

And here is Jay-Z giving the same handshake to another Freemason:

Jay-Z’s songs are also riddled with Freemasonic symbolism hidden in the lyrics. For example, in his most recent single called Run This Town, he says:

“back to runnin’ circles around niggas, now we squared up.”

This is a direct reference to the masonic concept of Squaring the Circle, as the symbol of Freemasonry is the Square and Compass. This is just one such example. Jay-Z also has a song entitled Lucifer, in which the chorus goes something like:

“Lucifer Lucifer, dawn of the morning!”

This is a direct reference to the esoteric version of Lucifer as a “Light [Intellect] Bringer.” Remember he is not just some obscure rapper, he is world famous and is still mainstream today.

Jay-Z also has his own clothing line, called RocaWear, where masonic symbols are often depicted. The following shirt features the All Seeing Eye giving light down, and on the bottom it says “Masters of the Craft.” This design is bordered by an Urobouros type serpent.

These are just some examples of this phenomenon. I feel that based upon evidence like this that it is more than just to mess with the minds of conspiracy theorists. It shows a much more uniform effort. For example, Jay-Z was made, rather than rose to prominence. He was given everything he has. Same with Lady Gaga, or any other mainstream rap star for that matter. They were made famous through marketing rather than becoming famous by gaining fans from from underground music scenes. Or why Nickelodeon would display such symbols? Basically there are a lot of questions to be asked about this subject.

Even if it were to just mess with the heads of conspiracy theorists, it shows that there is at least some force that is powerful enough to influence all these different pop “artists” from across all genres as well as television just to do so.

ARTICLE SOURCE: ATS.com

The ability to evaluate other people’s actions as right or wrong can be disrupted with an electromagnetic pulse to the brain, according to a study conducted by researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

“You think of morality as being a really high-level behavior,” lead researcher Dr Liane Young said. “To be able to apply a magnetic field to a specific brain region and change people’s moral judgments is really astonishing.”

Researchers had 20 volunteers listen to several scenarios, then assess the ethics of the people involved. In one experiment, some of the participants received a 25-minute burst of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to the nerve cluster known as the right temporo-parietal junction (RTPJ) before hearing the stories. In another experiment, some participants received the TMS burst for only 500 milliseconds after the stories, while being asked to make a judgment.

A TMS burst induces currents in the brain, causing nerve cells to malfunction.

The researchers found that in both cases, a TMS burst to the RTPJ made participants incapable of differentiating between morality and outcome. For example, participants were asked if a man acted ethically in allowing his girlfriend to cross a bridge he knew to be unsafe. When told that she made it safely across, participants whose RTPJ had been interfered with said the man had acted ethically, if she did not make it across, they said he had acted unethically.

Previous studies have found that the RTPJ becomes especially active when people think about others’ behavior or thoughts. The new research suggests it plays an important role in moral judgments that involve understanding other people’s intentions.

“What is interesting is that this is a region that is very late developing – into adolescence and beyond right into the 20s,” said Sarah-Jayne Blakemore of University College London “The next step would be to look at how or whether moral development changes through childhood into adulthood.”

Natural News.com

US supreme court justice Sonia Sotomayor has said the court is likely to have to rule on the issue of balancing national security and freedom of speech due to WikiLeaks posting a cache of US military records about the Afghan war.

Sotomayor said the incident, which has been condemned by the Pentagon, was likely to provoke legislation in Congress that would require judicial scrutiny.

Her comments came in response to a question about security and free speech by a student at Denver university. The judge said she could not answer because “that question is very likely to come before me”. She said the “incident, and others, are going to provoke legislation that’s already being discussed in Congress, and so some of it is going to come up before [the supreme court]“.

WikiLeaks posted more than 76,900 records of incidents and intelligence reports about the Afghan war on its website last month, providing a devastating portrait of the war. They revealed how coalition forces have killed hundreds of civilians in unreported incidents and how Nato commanders fear neighbouring Pakistan and Iran are fuelling the insurgency.

The publication of the files, which were made available to the Guardian, the New York Times and the German weekly Der Spiegel, was one of the biggest leaks in US military history. The Pentagon has said the leak put the lives of US service personnel and Afghan informants at risk – a charge WikiLeaks denies.

Sotomayor said the balance between national security and free speech is “a constant struggle in this society, between our security needs and our first amendment rights, and one that has existed throughout our history.”

Sotomayor compared the issue with the debate over allowing publication of the Pentagon Papers, a secret study about the Vietnam war. The New York Times published those in 1971 after the supreme court declined to block their publication over the objections of the Pentagon.

“That was not the beginning of that question, but an issue that keeps arising from generation to generation, of how far we will permit government restriction on freedom of speech in favor of protection of the country,” Sotomayor said. “There’s no black-and-white line.

Vigilant Citizen

Do you see, what I see ?
By WikiLeaks posting a lot of old news that anyone with half a brain already knew to begin with only opened the door to allow the censorship and suppression agenda that was already laid on the table in the public eye.
This is called gradualism.
In the south when they cook frogs, they put the unsuspecting frog in a pot of water and “GRADUALLY” turn the heat up cooking it alive.
Ladies and gentlemen…”Our Frogs are being cooked”.
Trust me, with Julian Assange and WikiLeaks, theres much more than meets the eye.