This commercial intended for German television has it all: checkerboard patterns everywhere, transhumanism, deshumanization, mind control, alter-personalities, Marilyn Monroe (the original Monarch sex kitten), the colors white, black and red, etc.

Katy Perry’s Illuminati, MK-Ultra Commercial
By Vigilant | September 4th, 2010 | Category: Latest News | 10 comments

This commercial intended for German television has it all: checkerboard patterns everywhere, transhumanism, deshumanization, mind control, alter-personalities, Marilyn Monroe (the original Monarch sex kitten), the colors white, black and red, etc.

“We love to entertain you”. In other words, this is the kind the stuff that is supposed to entertain you.

MTV.com published an article about the ad and here’s an excerpt:

“Katy Perry comes to life, channeling a futuristic Marilyn Monroe in a red dress that mimics the iconic white one in “The Seven Year Itch.” The singer then transforms into a 1960s housewife with a polka-dot geometric dress. But with a blink of an eye, that look is gone in favor of a superhero-gone-sex-kitten look. Riding a flaring rocket that floats before a building window, Perry shoots into the city lights before doing her spokesperson drop: “We love to entertain you.”
– MTV.com, Katy Perry Goes Futuristic In ‘Teenage Dream’ German TV Spot

Did MTV actually use the term sex kitten?

ARTICLE SOURCE: Vigilant Citizen

An illusion it will be, so large, so vast it will escape their perception.

Those who will see it will be thought of as insane.

We will create separate fronts to prevent them from seeing the connection between us.

We will behave as if we are not connected to keep the illusion alive. Our goal will be accomplished one drop at a time so as to never bring suspicion upon ourselves. This will also prevent them from seeing the changes as they occur.

We will always stand above the relative field of their experience for we know the secrets of the absolute.

We will work together always and will remain bound by blood and secrecy. Death will come to he who speaks.

We will keep their lifespan short and their minds weak while pretending to do the opposite.

We will use our knowledge of science and technology in subtle ways so they will never see what is happening.

We will use soft metals, aging accelerators and sedatives in food and water, also in the air.

They will be blanketed by poisons everywhere they turn.

The soft metals will cause them to lose their minds. We will promise to find a cure from our many fronts, yet we will feed them more poison.

The poisons will be absorbed trough their skin and mouths, they will destroy their minds and reproductive systems.

From all this, their children will be born dead, and we will conceal this information.

The poisons will be hidden in everything that surrounds them, in what they drink, eat, breathe and wear.

We must be ingenious in dispensing the poisons for they can see far.

We will teach them that the poisons are good, with fun images and musical tones.

Those they look up to will help. We will enlist them to push our poisons.

They will see our products being used in film and will grow accustomed to them and will never know their true effect.

When they give birth we will inject poisons into the blood of their children and convince them its for their help.

We will start early on, when their minds are young, we will target their children with what children love most, sweet things.

When their teeth decay we will fill them with metals that will kill their mind and steal their future.

When their ability to learn has been affected, we will create medicine that will make them sicker and cause other diseases for which we will create yet more medicine.

We will render them docile and weak before us by our power.

They will grow depressed, slow and obese, and when they come to us for help, we will give them more poison.

We will focus their attention toward money and material goods so they many never connect with their inner self. We will distract them with fornication, external pleasures and games so they may
never be one with the oneness of it all.

Their minds will belong to us and they will do as we say. If they refuse we shall find ways to implement mind-altering technology into their lives.

We will use fear as our weapon.

We will establish their governments and establish opposites within. We will own both sides.

We will always hide our objective but carry out our plan.

They will perform the labor for us and we shall prosper from their toil.

Our families will never mix with theirs. Our blood must be pure always, for it is the way.

We will make them kill each other when it suits us.

We will keep them separated from the oneness by dogma and religion.

We will control all aspects of their lives and tell them what to think and how.

We will guide them kindly and gently letting them think they are guiding themselves.

We will foment animosity between them through our factions.

When a light shall shine among them, we shall extinguish it by ridicule, or death, whichever suits us best.

We will make them rip each other’s hearts apart and kill their own children.

We will accomplish this by using hate as our ally, anger as our friend.

The hate will blind them totally, and never shall they see that from their conflicts we emerge as their rulers. They will be busy killing each other.

They will bathe in their own blood and kill their neighbors for as long as we see fit.

We will benefit greatly from this, for they will not see us, for they cannot see us.

We will continue to prosper from their wars and their deaths.

We shall repeat this over and over until our ultimate goal is accomplished.

We will continue to make them live in fear and anger though images and sounds.

We will use all the tools we have to accomplish this.

The tools will be provided by their labor.

We will make them hate themselves and their neighbors.

We will always hide the divine truth from them, that we are all one. This they must never know!

They must never know that color is an illusion, they must always think they are not equal.

Drop by drop, drop by drop we will advance our goal.

We will take over their land, resources and wealth to exercise total control over them.

We will deceive them into accepting laws that will steal the little freedom they will have.

We will establish a money system that will imprison them forever, keeping them and their children in debt.

When they shall ban together, we shall accuse them of crimes and present a different story to the world for we shall own all the media.

We will use our media to control the flow of information and their sentiment in our favor.

When they shall rise up against us we will crush them like insects, for they are less than that.

They will be helpless to do anything for they will have no weapons.

We will recruit some of their own to carry out our plans, we will promise them eternal life, but eternal life they will never have for they are not of us.

The recruits will be called “initiates” and will be indoctrinated to believe false rites of passage to higher realms. Members of these groups will think they are one with us never knowing the truth.
They must never learn this truth for they will turn against us.

For their work they will be rewarded with earthly things and great titles, but never will they become immortal and join us, never will they receive the light and travel the stars.

They will never reach the higher realms, for the killing of their own kind will prevent passage to the realm of enlightenment. This they will never know.

The truth will be hidden in their face, so close they will not be able to focus on it until its too late.

Oh yes, so grand the illusion of freedom will be, that they will never know they are our slaves.

When all is in place, the reality we will have created for them will own them. This reality will be their prison. They will live in self-delusion.

When our goal is accomplished a new era of domination will begin.

Their minds will be bound by their beliefs, the beliefs we have established from time immemorial.

But if they ever find out they are our equal, we shall perish then. THIS THEY MUST NEVER KNOW.

If they ever find out that together they can vanquish us, they will take action.

They must never, ever find out what we have done, for if they do, we shall have no place to run, for it will be easy to see who we are once the veil has fallen. Our actions will have revealed who we are and they will hunt us down and no person shall give us shelter.

This is the secret covenant by which we shall live the rest of our present and future lives, for this reality will transcend many generations and life spans.

This covenant is sealed by blood, our blood. We, the ones who from heaven to earth came.

This covenant must NEVER, EVER be known to exist. It must NEVER, EVER be written or spoken of for if it is, the consciousness it will spawn will release the fury of the PRIME CREATOR upon us and we shall be cast to the depths from whence we came and remain there until the end time of infinity itself.

This is a prime example of how we are being manipulated thru the occult practioners, the media and government.

In this Serta commercial there is obviously much, much more than meets the eye upon a casual view. Its imperative to pay particular attention to the numbers of the sheep. The 9 and 11 sheep were placed on pedestals which is representative of the 2 towers.
Other things to take note of include:
The blue eyes of the sheep, sheep do not have blue eyes. Sheep like many minorities or non aryan races have brown eyes.

The funny thing is, in this different Serta commercial the sheeps eyes are brown. Except for the lead sheep. Which change from blue to brown depending on the ad campaign.

Serta’s crescent moon logo, this could possibly be a referrence to Islam.
Lilies on the table @ 0:24 – lilies are in many cultures a symbol of life and death.

“Save Now” under the lilies = a message to tell those in the know that “Now” is the time that your actions would determine your “Saving”/”salvation” (life or death)

The black label hanging off the bed at 0:24 = black flag = death
The candle & mirror at 0:24 = occult/witchcraft/spells/etc

A FEW QUOTES FROM THE COMMERCIAL

What is a sheep born to do ?

Provide wool meaning to “Pull the wool over your eyes?”

Yeah, “Looking good, No. 9, looking good.”

The the sheep goes,

“Where is your dignity?”

I’m sure that is just blatant code. Someone is giving the OK for a certain date – or something else. Remember the Illuminati feel exonerated of any guilt if they feel like they have pre-warned the world about what they are about to do. It would be interesting to have a look at advertisement in 2001 leading up to the twin towers tragedy.

This Sept. 11 will be exactly 9 years since the towers came down.

From the Serta site. a bio of #1 sheep:

Serta Sheep #1—The Leader of the Flock
The boss of the Serta Counting Sheep. #1 instigates all anti-Serta activity. Clever, determined, and afraid of no one. he devises scheme after scheme to thwart Serta’s mission to provide a good night’s sleep to all. No one Is sure where #1 came from. Other Serta sheep recall him simply showing up one day and organizing the ongoing rebellion. “He was mesmerizing.” says #9, “I remember the day he came to us. We were all just standing around right next to each other eating grass. A few of the ewes fell in love with him. I mean, they took one look at him and the cud Just fell right out of their mouths.”
Not only Is he charismatic and persuasive. #1 is an endless source of ideas. From blackmail to dirty tricks, he is relentless In his determination to put his flock back to work, doing what they were born to do… be counted by the sleepless.

Serta Sheep #1 Stats
• Origins unknown: believed to be from the Upper Midwest, possibly Detroit area
• Types 65 WPM (with snout)
• Is believed to have military experience; often requests meetings at “Oh-elght-hundred hours.” etc.
• Becomes uncharacteristically docile while being shorn
• Is afraid of thunder

This sounds more like an intelligence agency’s dossier on a subject they are monitoring.
And who is the God of thunder ? Thor
Also get this…
Anthrax is a disease bourne by sheep; anthrax is also a powder; anthrax is the 5th biblical plague; anthrax is a bio weapon. The sheep have a “bio”.

ARTICLE: GLP

A nice example of “predictive programming”

Last week, as the rain lashed outside, my daughter and I settled down for an afternoon of family nostalgia. The type that Walt Disney films excel at.

The kind that has given Disney a special position in our house. To us, the brand suggests a world of family values and bygone traditions. A place where, no matter the adversity faced, good WILL triumph over evil.

Disney films speak to our heart and embroider the lives of our children with a sense of security in an uncertain world.

So it was, this rain-soaked day, we laughed and cried our way through a hat trick of Disney favourites: the heart-rendingly beautiful Bambi, the gloriously regal Lion King and the eternally charming Finding Nemo.

But later, I realised something else that binds Disney films, other than good old nostalgic charm: an absence of parents.

Bambi, abandoned by his father before birth, experiences the hunting and subsequent shooting of his mummy. A tragedy that still reduces me to uncontrollable sobs four decades after I first saw it with my own mother.

That’s not all. In the Lion King, Simba is implicated in the death of his father and runs away in a vain attempt to escape his misery.

While Nemo – the rebellious fish – is the sole survivor of a violent barracuda attack on his mother and siblings and spends much of the story estranged from his father.

The realisation that these three films all drew on a parent-less theme made me reel. Surely it was only coincidence?

Apparently not. For Disney, that most child-friendly of organisations, appears to have something of a parent problem.

Since its formation in the Twenties, Disney’s output has featured a steady supply of dysfunctional and broken families.

Orphan: Mowgli in the care of Baloo in the Disney film The Jungle Book 2

Dumbo, like Bambi, still devastates audiences, as the fatherless baby elephant is separated from his mother after she is locked up for her apparent psychosis.

The moggies in the Aristocats – a personal childhood favourite – are also fatherless. Neither Ariel (The Little Mermaid) or Belle (Beauty And The Beast) have a mother.

Even more recently, fans worldwide have delighted in the final instalment of Toy Story, as Andy – the film’s main character – is raised by a single parent mother.

Not to worry, though, in the total absence of his father, Andy’s key male influence is a wooden cowboy.

And it’s not just Disney’s cartoon output that is subject to this parental peculiarity; its non-animation TV shows and movies are, too.

On Disney’s TV channel, the popular Hannah Montana – played by the precocious Miley Cyrus – learns the teenage ropes from her single parent father because her mother is AWOL.

On the big screen, The Game Plan chronicles a ten-year-old girl searching for her long-lost father after the untimely – although not entirely unpredictable – demise of her single parent mother.

And the Grammy- nominated Enchanted captures Giselle, an archetypal Disney princess, adapting to the harsh environment of New York as a motherless young girl.

By this point in my research, I was becoming increasingly disturbed by the absence of parental role models in the world of Walt Disney. And there was more.

Some Disney characters aren’t even fortunate enough to have one parent and are orphaned before the opening credits are over.

Baby Tarzan was abandoned in the jungle after the savaging of his parents by a leopard. And there’s Tod in The Fox And The Hound and Arthur in The Sword In The Stone, who are left to pursue their destinies without parents.

Fatherless: Dumbo devastates the audience when he becomes separated from his mother in the 1941 hit.

I wonder, is this distinct lack of parental care in Disney productions used for dramatic effect?

Is it there to give the main protagonist an opportunity to face their personal challenges without the guidance of a parent – or is there more to this?

Might the death of Walt Disney’s mother – and the lifelong guilt this left her son with – be the catalyst for the death of parents in Disney?

In 1938 and riding high with the proceeds from his first big screen movie Sleeping Beauty, Walt bought his mother, Flora, and his father, Elias, a house in LA as a golden wedding anniversary present.

Within days of moving in, Flora complained about the stultifying temperatures coming from the central heating boiler and her doting son arranged for a swift replacement.

Days later, Flora died from asphyxiation caused by the new, poorly-installed, boiler.

Might Walt Disney’s misplaced guilt over his mother’s death have led him to airbrush parents – mothers in particular – out of his works?

And has that motivation, after his death in 1966, become a Disney blueprint?

Certainly, it would explain the types of folk stories and fairytales that Disney has acquired for adaptation, even when there are numerous other traditional tales that feature a mother and father.

The company animated Cinderella (no mother), Snow White (no mother or father, but a wicked stepmum) and The Jungle Book (orphaned Mowgli, raised by a bear and a tiger).

But perhaps most audacious in this regard was the purchase of J.M. Barrie’s epic Peter Pan, where the boy-child not only had responsibility for a whole island of orphans (The Lost Boys) but Wendy’s parents socialised constantly and left their children in the care of the family dog.

There is a third way to explain Disney’s apparent downer on parents.

Might the company – and its output – be a true reflection of our disparate society and the obvious disintegration of the traditional nuclear family?

Or might it be the other way around? Might Disney have played its own part in the demise of family values given that we – and our children – have fallen for this wholesome entertainment for decades?

Have we subconsciously imbibed this airbrushing out of parental figures from its films?

If nothing else, Disney stands accused of failing to honour that most sacred of bonds – that of the mother and the father to their children.

Now, that is hardly family entertainment, is it ?

ARTICLE SOURCE: Daily Mail via Vigilante Citizen

The pyramid and the all-seeing eye. An ancient occult symbol that shows up in religion, churches, Egypt, alchemy, on money, artwork, logos, crop circles, business models, architecture, food, pharma, government and fraternal organizations. Why? This symbol has been a great catalyst for philosophical, religious and political debate. Watch as we trace the pyramid and eye throughout history from Ancient Egypt and Sumer, leading up to the Masons and pop-culture of today. Then, we ask movie goers at the 33rd Gothenburg International Film Festival why this symbol is showing up in Hollywood movies again and again. With all the big film budgets and creative teams available, why the constant use of the pyramid and eye? Let’s explore the origins, possible meaning and purpose behind the pyramid and the eye symbolism, for some of us, a symbol we see everyday.

Is it just more ramping up of our collective unconscious fear ? Why do the PTB keep shock-testing us with weird movies, feigned pandemics and set-up scandals and outrages of the moment ?
Pay very close attention to TV, they ALWAYS warn in plain sight in advance.

Black president
Airline terrorism
Mysterious disappearances
Impending doom

Think of it like this, the Illuminati are like Vampires, they have to trick their way into your homes. They cant just kick in your door its against their code.
When you see these types of movies (especially on TV), something similar is soon to happen. Be on guard this is predictive programming at its peak.
If you doubt me, when this series airs…pay even closer attention to the symbols in each scene.

Although many of you will object to this, those with keen eyes know that the symbolism of the All Seeing Eye is literally everywhere. This is no question. The real question is why ? Is it just a cruel joke by unassociated individuals to mess with the heads of conspiracy theorists? The way I see it is that these symbols are used today as marks of ownership as well as to mark things that contain symbolic significance containing a message. The elite are not so careless as to mark their innermost texts with these symbols. However, some things, such as logos, are marked with these symbols. The focus of this writing will be on the All Seeing Eye. First I will explain some of the meaning behind the All Seeing Eye.

The All Seeing Eye is a symbol comprised of an eye within a triangle. Often light is shining down from the eye. It is called in Freemasonry the Eye of the Great Architect. There are two explanations to the symbol of the eye. The first is that some believe the eye to be the Eye of Ra, an ancient Egyptian sun deity who is also a manifestation of the god Amen [Amun], known as The Hidden One. The other explanation for the eye is that it is the Eye of Horus, which I find a bit more interesting.

Horus, also originally a Sun Deity, later became attributed with being a sky/duality deity, representing both the Sun and the Moon, with his right eye representing the Sun, again called the Eye of Ra, and the left eye representing the Moon, called the Eye of Tehuti. Interestingly, Tehuti is also known as Thoth, who in occult circles is known as Thoth Hermes Trismegistus, or the Thrice Greatest. He is also known as Hermes to the Greek. Thoth Hermes Trismegistus is a knowledge bringer [Luciferian/Promethean] deity accredited with divulging the divine sciences of Alchemy, Astrology, and Theurgy to humanity. Some also credit him with mathematics, language, among other things. In the esoteric view, Thoth Hermes Trismegistus is believed to have been at one time an actual person who was eventually deified…

The All Seeing Eye usually features a LEFT EYE.

But first of all, DO these symbols actually appear on things tied to the elite ? The answer is yes.. but is it all just coincidence ?
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS COINCIDENCE !

1) The Information Awareness Office logo:

Funded by DARPA, the Information Awareness Office’s stated goal was to collect as much information on everyone and everything as possible. This drew much flack to them and the IAO was discontinued. However, its core projects still continue under different names. The logo depicts the Illuminati pyramid with All Seeing Eye shining its light over a globe.

2) The MI5 Logo. Military Intelligence Section 5.

3) Fidelity Investments Logo:

4) AOL logo:

However, what is more interesting is that these symbols are all over popular media since as early as the 60s and 70s in very hidden and yet deliberate places. So either all these different artists/people are purposefully putting in these symbols just to mess with conspiracy theorists, or there is some greater power at work:

4) For example, here is Madonna bearing the symbol on her back. The name Madonna also has obvious esoteric significance:

5) All Seeing Eye flashed in Nickelodeon logo, along with CBS logo type eyes. If they are just putting it in to mess with the minds of conspiracy theorists, why would they put it here ? How many conspiracy theorists watch Nickelodeon, and why was it flashed quickly as if it were a subliminal ? [note this is back in the 90s]:

6) Michael Jackson’s Dangerous album cover contains the All Seeing Eye as well as the Skull and Crossbones. It is a goldmine of occult symbolism.

Some people believe that Michael Jackson was actually killed by the Illuminati and had been subjected to character assassination in the years prior. This is due to a recent comment by Michael Jackson about a year ago speaking out about the Illuminati, hinting that he was going to utilize his then upcoming “come back” world tour to spread his message and awareness, particularly with a song called “They don’t care about us.” The music video for the song depicts a rural third world country where Michael is dancing with the people, while UN Peacekeeper looking people stand by monotonously giving a fascist presence. In one scene, Michael is seen dancing next to an all-seeing eye that is painted on the wall.

7) Here is recent pop sensation Lady Gaga. Her backup dancers bear the All Seeing Eye symbol on their backs:

Now Lady Gaga is an interesting character. As we all know, music, television, etc.. all influence people in large and yet subtle ways. Lady Gaga’s musical message is one of emptying thoughts and acting as one feels, exemplified by her song Just Dance. It is basically Orwell’s concept of Bellyfeel from 1984. She is often shown speaking in a robotic manner, or acting as if she were mind controlled. Whether or not this is just her public persona it is definitely interesting. She is also often seen with butterfly symbolism, which is a direct reference to MONARCH Programming.. but there’s more.

The word “gaga” roughly means a sort of astonished stupor, for example “he was gaga over that girl.” It is also a direct reference to the Queen song, Radio Gaga. In the music video for Radio Gaga, many scenes from the 1927 movie Metropolis was used. The movie Metropolis is about a woman who is chosen by a futuristic scientist to be “sacrificed” in a black magic/scientific ritual in order to give life to a robot. The experiment is a success and the now alive robot also proved to be very popular among the people. Then the scientist in the movie utilized the public adoration of the robot with the aim of manipulating the public into doing his bidding. His goal was to cause the public to destroy themselves [they end up unwittingly killing their own children and destroying their city].

Lady Gaga’s symbol is that of a headless mannequin with a lightning bolt through it. This of course symbolizes a body which is charged with some sort of outside force that moves it. Mind control themes are often referenced in her songs, which also contain many other occult symbols such as that of associating her with Baphomet, a hermaphroditic goat-headed and winged deity representing the dualistic principles “as above so below” and “order out of chaos.” She is also rumored to be a hermaphrodite herself.

Another thing of interest is that she had an entire photo-shoot in a Masonic Temple, in which she had eyes painted onto her eyelids and took the series of photos with her eyes closed. The esoteric significance of this symbolism is obvious.

Credit Vigilant Citizen for much of the Lady Gaga info, you can check it out HERE

In mainstream rap/hip-hop:

90s rapper Tupac was very vocal about speaking out against the Illuminati. He once said in one of his songs called They Don’t Give A # About Us [Michael Jackson's They Don't Care About Us comes to mind], “some say they expect Illuminati take my body to sleep”

Another line used is “Illuminati want my mind soul and my body.” [Also used by Prodigy]

Another rapper, called Prodigy, of the 90s group Mobb Deep, wrote letters from prison condemning popular mainstream rappers Jay-Z and Kanye West, among others, for selling out to the Illuminati and knowingly selling their message. Originally, rap was a means for the black community to speak out against the wrongs in society. Now, rap has turned into a commercial venture selling the message of get money, get drugs and get bitches, often dropping direct product placement.

Prodigy’s letters also speak out against the banking system among other things. Here is one of such letters:

9) Rapper Jay-Z
As mentioned before, owns a record company called Roc-A-Fella records, a direct reference to Rockefeller. He is considered the one who benefited the most from the deaths of Tupac and Biggie in 96 and 97 respectively. Jay-Z came onto the scene and out of obscurity in 95-96 and was drastically less talented than either Tupac or Biggie, who rapped about the ills of society. With their deaths, he was propelled directly to the top with the help of the invisible hand of MTV.

One symbol that Jay-Z uses to represent himself and his company is called the Roc. It consists of two hands forming a triangular shape and then being placed in front of the left eye:

Jay-Z is also known to be a Freemason, and has been pictured giving rapper Kanye West, also signed under Roc-A-Fella Records and also a Freemason, a Freemason handshake.

And here is Jay-Z giving the same handshake to another Freemason:

Jay-Z’s songs are also riddled with Freemasonic symbolism hidden in the lyrics. For example, in his most recent single called Run This Town, he says:

“back to runnin’ circles around niggas, now we squared up.”

This is a direct reference to the masonic concept of Squaring the Circle, as the symbol of Freemasonry is the Square and Compass. This is just one such example. Jay-Z also has a song entitled Lucifer, in which the chorus goes something like:

“Lucifer Lucifer, dawn of the morning!”

This is a direct reference to the esoteric version of Lucifer as a “Light [Intellect] Bringer.” Remember he is not just some obscure rapper, he is world famous and is still mainstream today.

Jay-Z also has his own clothing line, called RocaWear, where masonic symbols are often depicted. The following shirt features the All Seeing Eye giving light down, and on the bottom it says “Masters of the Craft.” This design is bordered by an Urobouros type serpent.

These are just some examples of this phenomenon. I feel that based upon evidence like this that it is more than just to mess with the minds of conspiracy theorists. It shows a much more uniform effort. For example, Jay-Z was made, rather than rose to prominence. He was given everything he has. Same with Lady Gaga, or any other mainstream rap star for that matter. They were made famous through marketing rather than becoming famous by gaining fans from from underground music scenes. Or why Nickelodeon would display such symbols? Basically there are a lot of questions to be asked about this subject.

Even if it were to just mess with the heads of conspiracy theorists, it shows that there is at least some force that is powerful enough to influence all these different pop “artists” from across all genres as well as television just to do so.

ARTICLE SOURCE: ATS.com

US supreme court justice Sonia Sotomayor has said the court is likely to have to rule on the issue of balancing national security and freedom of speech due to WikiLeaks posting a cache of US military records about the Afghan war.

Sotomayor said the incident, which has been condemned by the Pentagon, was likely to provoke legislation in Congress that would require judicial scrutiny.

Her comments came in response to a question about security and free speech by a student at Denver university. The judge said she could not answer because “that question is very likely to come before me”. She said the “incident, and others, are going to provoke legislation that’s already being discussed in Congress, and so some of it is going to come up before [the supreme court]“.

WikiLeaks posted more than 76,900 records of incidents and intelligence reports about the Afghan war on its website last month, providing a devastating portrait of the war. They revealed how coalition forces have killed hundreds of civilians in unreported incidents and how Nato commanders fear neighbouring Pakistan and Iran are fuelling the insurgency.

The publication of the files, which were made available to the Guardian, the New York Times and the German weekly Der Spiegel, was one of the biggest leaks in US military history. The Pentagon has said the leak put the lives of US service personnel and Afghan informants at risk – a charge WikiLeaks denies.

Sotomayor said the balance between national security and free speech is “a constant struggle in this society, between our security needs and our first amendment rights, and one that has existed throughout our history.”

Sotomayor compared the issue with the debate over allowing publication of the Pentagon Papers, a secret study about the Vietnam war. The New York Times published those in 1971 after the supreme court declined to block their publication over the objections of the Pentagon.

“That was not the beginning of that question, but an issue that keeps arising from generation to generation, of how far we will permit government restriction on freedom of speech in favor of protection of the country,” Sotomayor said. “There’s no black-and-white line.

Vigilant Citizen

Do you see, what I see ?
By WikiLeaks posting a lot of old news that anyone with half a brain already knew to begin with only opened the door to allow the censorship and suppression agenda that was already laid on the table in the public eye.
This is called gradualism.
In the south when they cook frogs, they put the unsuspecting frog in a pot of water and “GRADUALLY” turn the heat up cooking it alive.
Ladies and gentlemen…”Our Frogs are being cooked”.
Trust me, with Julian Assange and WikiLeaks, theres much more than meets the eye.

Facebook launched Facebook Places yesterday.
Anyone can find out where you are when you are logged in. It gives the actual address & map location of where you are as you use Facebook.

Make sure this goes viral so that every Facebook user knows they can literally be monitored and tracked at any time.

TO UNDO: Go to”Account“,”Account Settings“, “Notifications“, then scroll down to “Places” and uncheck both of the two boxes. Make sure to SAVE changes and re-post this !

Facebook Places: Be your friends’ ‘Big Brother?’

I hope you have nothing but good, trustworthy friends. If you don’t, they might tell the world you are in some pretty crazy, or even disturbing, places, thanks to Facebook’s new “Places” tool.

An angry “friend”, for example, can broadcast to everyone (including your boss) that you are in a coffee shop, museum or airport — even if you are sitting in your cubicle working. Even if you haven’t agreed to use Facebook’s location service. And even if you aren’t logged in to Facebook.

The new Places tool, which is integrated into the standard Facebook mobile application, was released last week with much fanfare and some hand-wringing about its privacy implications. For the most part, however, Places offers users lot of control over when they tell others where they are. Users must actively check-in — as opposed to being automatically checked in — as they move around.

But there’s an exception: By default, friends can “check you in” whenever they want, and wherever they happen to be. While checked-in friends don’t appear in the Places tool without their approval, the check-ins are announced to the world on the friend’s wall through status updates. Further, those updates are controlled by your friend’s privacy policies, not yours.

In other words, Facebook’s tool makes violating your friends’ privacy easy.

“I think it’s quite Orwellian. We have literally become each others’ Big Brothers,” said Alessandro Acquisti, a privacy expert at Carnegie Mellon University.

There is a way to turn this feature off (instructions below). And checked-in friends receive notice that they’ve been “tagged” as present in a place, and have the opportunity to remove the tag. By then, however, the damage could be done.

Last year, a Web site named “PleaseRobMe.com” created a stir when it poked fun at location-disclosure Web sites like Foursquare.com as creating opportunities for would-be home burglars by making it easy to determine when users were not home. But at least Foursquare users decide for themselves when they will reveal where they are.

Now, if you are my friend, Facebook lets me tell my friends — and with some tweaks, everyone — that you are with me, wherever I am.

Facebook has so far responded to this complaint by saying there is no problem. Friends who are checked in don’t appear in Places until they consent. And publishing location information in status updates is no big deal, according to the social networking site.

“People have always been able to tell others where they’ve seen friends,” said Facebook spokesman Barry Schnitt. For example, I can update my status by saying, “Reader Jane Doe is with me at this Seattle coffee shop,” even if that were a lie. But that’s a false analogy, warns Acquisti.

“People usually don’t broadcast to hundreds of friends, as well as strangers, at the same time your current, or presumed, location,” he said.

Also, Facebook Places creates a level of validation that a mere status update would not. Users have to be near the place they check in — location-based services in a mobile device verify that — so when a Places user tells the world, “I’m at the Bellevue movie theater with LeBron,” it’s far more believable.

Finally, users who are spooked by a Places status update, but who log in infrequently, won’t receive notice for days, or even weeks.

Debate about the friends’ check-in issue has been raging at an information ethics blog run by Michael Zimmer, a professor at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Facebook’s Schnitt has even jumped into the conversation there, arguing that new Places tools actually provide users even greater control over personal information than they’ve had before.

But Zimmer isn’t buying it.

“While I understand that users could always mention someone else in status updates, there’s a meaningful difference with regard to Places,” Zimmer told me. “Facebook has provided an official and automated means of sharing someone’s location, where users can now be systematically linked to a specific set of coordinates. These new check-ins could be potentially logged into a database, archived, mined… This is a significant change from just mentioning someone. The concern here is that locational data needs to be treated differently than just an average status update. This is why Facebook has tried to design the system so that, in their terms, no one can be checked in to a location ‘without their explicit permission’. Unfortunately, they fell short.”

Facebook’s business plan
Why would Facebook stubbornly keep this spooky feature in its new tool, and enable it by default, over the wide-eyed objections of privacy advocates?

There are two ways to create a fast-growing new business:

1. Create a new product that’s so useful, millions of people rush to use it.

2. Have an existing business that millions of people use, and force them to use your new product.

Here, Facebook has picked technique No. 2. Its Places feature must play catch-up to a host of existing location services like Foursquare. There’s no better way to catch up to a first-mover than tying your new feature into your existing product. And one way to make consumers use that product is to compel them to do so. Facebook is counting on its amazing network effects and help from early adopters, who will drag otherwise indifferent users into its location tool, like this: “What? Someone’s telling everyone else where I am? I’d better check out this new ‘Places,’ thing.”

My colleague Wilson Rothman offered a compelling argument last week that Facebook is the new Google. People use Facebook to find things more than ever. But if I were Facebook, I’d be worried about the Justice Department seeing Facebook as the new Microsoft, attacking small competitors with its dominant market position, forcing users to adopt a product that subsumes another start-up — and doing it with an aloof, take-no-prisoners attitude that will someday wrinkle the nose of the wrong U.S. Senator.

Places, like so many Facebook tools, is clever, well-designed, integrated nicely with the rest of the service, and can be fun to use. It’s hard to imagine a better way to find friends when you arrive in a city for a convention or family wedding. You can simply ask your mobile phone, “Who’s nearby?” or “Who’s in my favorite Irish bar down the corner?” Used deftly, it might even help you avoid an awkward meeting with an old girlfriend.

But the way it’s been designed for maximum network effect, Places is just as likely to help an old boyfriend’s stalking efforts. All it takes is a random friend attempting to check in the former girlfriend.

Consumers have long had a tortured relationship with privacy — most say it’s important to them, but few actually behave that way. That’s because it’s often hard to predict the future consequences of a privacy-related transaction, Acquisti says.

“Giving someone your privacy is like giving someone a blank check,” he says. “You never know what amount might be filled in when it comes back to you.”

Dealing with location information should create an extra level of caution, Zimmer says.

“Not to be paranoid, but there are serious concerns about this,” he said. “People don’t think about (location information) much, but it can reveal quite a bit about you. When you start piecing information together, you can start figuring out what kind of person someone is — say if they are in a particular church, or they are at a location near a women’s health clinic. It might reveal something about you, or assumptions might be made about you that are not really true.”

Red Tape Wrestling Tips
While there are several privacy layers available for use with the Places tool, the simplest way to avoid Places headaches is to opt out of automatic placement by friends. It’s relatively simple, though I wish it were simpler. Visit Facebook.com, click on account, and then “privacy settings.” Then, at the bottom of that page, click on the word “customize settings.” Under the category, “Things others share,” find “Friends can check me in to Places,” and select “Disabled.” While you are there, review your other settings and make sure you are comfortable with them.

To fine-tune your Places settings even more, look under “Things I share,” and select who can see the places you check in to, and decide if you want others to see you in the “People Here Now” area. But remember, even if you limit the number of people who can see you after you check yourself in, you haven’t controlled who can know if you’ve been checked in by a friend — that’s controlled by your friend’s privacy settings, not yours. In this scenario, even if you have opted out of broadcasting your places setting, while you won’t appear in the “People Here Now” area, your presence will be disclosed on your Friend’s wall post unless you’ve disabled “Friends can check me in.”

Finally, as with all privacy issues, it’s often true that information which seems meaningless today might be valuable, and used against you, tomorrow. Divorce lawyers, for example, regularly subpoena supermarket loyalty cards while fighting child custody cases (“Look at all this junk food he buys, your honor!”). It makes sense to limit your use of any tool that helps build a database of location-based information while we all learn what the long-term implications might be.

Yes, this isn’t news to anyone, this already was discussed here, but after all what EXACTLY do you know about the Illuminati pedophile agenda of Walt Disney company ? And how much do you actually know ?

I’m sure that, due the economic crisis, terrorist threats, endless wars and imminent social disorders, the most of North-American people aren’t paying the due attention to one of the most sinister, evil and destructive threats to US social structure: The Disney Illuminati pedophile agenda.

And please don’t say – “Oh no, not this again!”, ‘cos this is exactly what they want, exactly what they need. Time and ignorance.
A few years ago, the Walt Disney children mind control perverted agenda was severely exposed. Massive scandals involving children pornography with employees of theme parks and members of high staff and a public crusade led by the organizations as American Mothers and religious groups. The storm became a huge hurricane. The urban legends about subliminal porno messages in movie frames, cartoons and Disney merchandising, became several legal charges and arresting of employees, based in more and more denounces of witnesses or people that were directly or indirectly sexually abused in the Disney parks. But it seems that the circumstances favored the cover up of the evil agenda behind Disney company. Also it seems that they got stronger and bigger. The Disney company just acquired Marvel Entertainment for $4 billion, in my opinion this suggests that the evil agenda is going to another chapter.

So, lets do a brief review of the prior chapters:
Walt Disney was part of an Illuminati family. His initial interest was not in kids in the way you might think, but he was in fact a sexual pervert and pedophile, which was displayed in everything he did. He was also a big time occultist, a 33° Freemason, member of the “Order of DeMolay” and during decades his sinister agenda remained hidden behind all those cartoons, magazines, movies etc. An agenda to control children’s minds.
Disney productions over the years are filled with Masonic symbolism, mind control and indoctrination through subliminal messages. They are preparing the younger generations for the NWO as well as introduce them to sorcery (black magic). Many current celebrities that have started their careers in Disney shows, as Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera and Justin Timberlake, are indeed puppets and mind control victims and the scandals they are usually involved give us a clue about what you learn inside Disney world.

Disney Freemason commemorative postcard

Justin Timberlake and Britney Spears started their careers as “Mouseketeers”. After growing up, they became artists with strong sensual appeal to youth masses. In short, its no secret Disney sells youth sex.




Christina Aguilera, also was a “Mousekeeter” and it seems that she was severely affected by Disney mind’s programing.
Yes, thats Aguilera in the picture you see above. Yes the guy inside Donald’s suit is doing exactly what you see. And yes, the photo was taken inside a Disney theme park.

Sexual perversion and sexualization of children are in the top of Disney company’s agenda. The current mind controlled puppet is the teen pop artist Miley Cyrus and judging by her successful career, it seems that North-American society is losing the battle against Illuminati-Disney propaganda.


The product is sold within that package, is announced by Disney as having the shape of a “guitar” or a “microphone”, but definitely what you see looks like something else… Beneath is the actual product image without censor blur or photo editing.


Also many people do NOT realize that the Disney company has a line of underwear they market directly towards children and its merchandising spares no one. Here is an image of a little girl fully exposed in sexy poses. And below, fancy erotic clothes to marketed to adult people.

In the picture below, judging by the clothes of the second employee at left and the way the second employee at right, is staring at her, we can realize what happens within Disney theme parks.

But lets dig a bit deeper:

Jack Enter, a former Atlanta detective, has studied the Peeping Tom Phenomenon at Disney. He’s been called as a witness to trials involving Magic Kingdom Peepers involving restrooms, changing rooms and dressing rooms. In one reported incident, Disney merely taped over the holes with duct tape. “It was amazing,” said Enter. “So many guys had been standing on the ceiling pipe looking into the room that the insulation was worn off the top of the pipe”. It would stand to reason though, that if someone is a pervert, pedophile, peeping Tom or Just One Of Those Types, like any “criminal” they gravitate and seek out the environment that allows them to pursue their habits. To these people Disneyland is well….just like a Disneyland.

When asked about this, Security Officer Hertog said, “Boys will be boys. This has been going on at Disney for 20 years. A large workforce will attract oddballs”. However it’s gotten worse – an investigations manager could recall only one case older than 15 years.

Rich Jeeley confessed in a Disney Security Statement that he regularly flashed guests at the park for over a year. Disney knew he had an “extensive”‘ criminal sex crimes record but did nothing until he was caught peeing through guest hotel bedroom windows at night. They fired him but never notified the police.

Maintenance worker Vince Amato was caught peeping on guests trying on clothes in the fitting room of the Disney Village Market “Captain’s Tower”. He was reported three times. Disney’s answer was to transfer him to another job.

Employees caught exposing themselves to park guests or peeping on “guests” in changing rooms in stores, even if they are children, have in the past been fired but not turned over to authorities.

A transportation supervisor who worked at Disney was arrested after contacting a 13 year old boy on AOL’s “Orlando” chat room using his Disney connections and promises of Disney stuff as a reward. When arrested by police they said he had so much Disney merchandise at his home it ‘looked like a shrine’. (And since this chat room is a known hot bed for Disney Pervs to hang out in, does AOL monitor the chat in the Orlando chat room 24/7? Of course not.)

This same chat room was where Matt Irwin thought he hit paydirt in the form of a 13 year old girl, who turned out to be a cop. He told the ‘girl’ he worked for Disneyland and gave her a number to reach him at; which turned out to be his number all right – at the Animation section at Disney studios. Irwin had previously won an Emmy for his work on “Winnie the Pooh”.

Doug Rehman has lectured at the FBI and was a senior law enforcement official with the Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement, which includes every government agency, local, county and state agency that deals with pedophiles. They teach proactive skills in spotting, finding, profiling and preventing crimes which victimize children. They have trained the staff at places such as Sea World, Universal Studio’s Water Park. Disney has declined offers to train their staff.

In Feb. 1996 a 7-year old girl reported that she saw a man with his zipper down, touching himself at Disney’s Blizzard Beach Water Park. When it was reported by a second girl on a second morning, Disney confronted an employee matching the description. He admitted to doing this and was fired. Disney waited 7 hours to report this incident to the local authorities, just long enough for the girl who witnessed him masturbating, and her mother, to check out of Disney’s hotel and go back home. No arrest was made, because strangely enough, Disney “lost” the little girl’s contact information.

Sgt. Mark Thompson of the Oscala, Florida County Sheriff Dept. said: “We had a guy who traveled the Disney hotels and go to the pool areas. He was taking close-up photos of kids climbing in and out of pools. Three or Four year olds and sometimes suits weren’t covering backsides properly, if you know what I mean. You just knew he was going to make a move on a kid. We wanted to get him but Disney didn’t want any part of it”.

Jimmie Dennis was arrested in Nov. 1996 in Orlando for “committing lewd acts upon a child”. While awaiting trial he applied for a job at Disney in the entertainment division, and got hired as a costumed character. His job was to roam the park, hugging kids and sitting them on his lap. He kept the job until August 21, 1997 when he was convicted of his previous crime. The attorney who prosecuted said this was a great example of why Disney needed to do background checks on people. As mentioned earlier – pedophiles look for chances to expand their opportunities.

David Fisher got fired from a job at the Oscelo School District in 1991 for several reports of “‘excessive touching of girls”. Regardless, he got a job at the Disney Fort Wilderness Campground. I’ll spare you the reports and details this sick waste of life generated before he finally got nailed. Disney, however, did manage to explain that “the cost of background checks on it’s employees would be prohibitive”. I’ll also mention that the Florida Dept. of Law offers arrest records for $15 each.

Disney Perverts-Anomalies Unlimited.com

Lake County Deputies booked Timothy Lillo, 34, from Mascotte, maintenance worker of Disney World, into jail on 25 counts of possession of child pornography. He was booked into the lake County jail on Tuesday and held on $250,000 bond.

Disney 2020 Boycott

A Disney employee was charged Thursday after police said he possessed child pornography. Paul Fazio, 68, works in the gift shop at the Animal Kingdom Lodge.

Police said Fazio was one of 14 arrested in the Polk County police operation. They also said Fazio admitted to possessing the pornography and said he liked to look at pictures of adults having sex with infants.

“The reality is it goes much further than child porn — it’s sexual abuse of children”, Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd said. Judd said during a month-long undercover sting, detectives found 14 men with a combined 42,000 pornographic images and movies of children.

Justin Hlebichuk, 22, from Lakeland, confessed to having the pornography as well.

“The youngest one I had was 14 — that was shown, but I guess younger women just look a little better sometimes”, he said.

Detectives said four of the men were linked and had swapped pornographic images in the past. Hlebichuk said he was sexually abused as a child, but he said he believes that that is still not an excuse for possessing child pornography.

“(It doesn’t) matter how much a person’s abused, they know the difference between right and wrong. I knew what I was doing, and I did it”, he said.

Fazio told investigators that he has evidence-destruction software. Police said he is facing 51 charges.

A registered sex offender was arrested on suspicion of grabbing an 11-year-old girl’s buttocks at Downtown Disney. Jose Angel Pamblanco Morales, 24, of Orlando, was arrested Wednesday on a charge of lewd or lascivious molestation.

According to the Orange County Sheriff’s Office, a complaint about the incident was filed, and a man matching the description of the suspect was located in front of the BET Soundstage Club at Pleasure Island. The girl positively identified Morales, and he was arrested.

Vigilantantis.com

A Disney employee was charged Thursday after police said he possessed child pornography. Paul Fazio, 68, works in the gift shop at the Animal Kingdom Lodge.
Police said Fazio was one of 14 arrested in the Polk County police operation.
They also said Fazio admitted to possessing the pornography and said he liked to look at pictures of adults having sex with infants.
“The reality is it goes much further than child porn — it’s sexual abuse of children”, Polk County Sheriff Grady Judd said.
Judd said during a month-long undercover sting, detectives found 14 men with a combined 42,000 pornographic images and movies of children.
Justin Hlebichuk, 22, from Lakeland, confessed to having the pornography as well.
“The youngest one I had was 14 — that was shown, but I guess younger women just look a little better sometimes”, he said.
Detectives said four of the men were linked and had swapped pornographic images in the past. Hlebichuk said he was sexually abused as a child, but he said he believes that that is still not an excuse for possessing child pornography.
“(It doesn’t) matter how much a person’s abused, they know the difference between right and wrong. I knew what I was doing, and I did it”, he said.
Fazio told investigators that he has evidence-destruction software. Police said he is facing 51 charges.

A registered sex offender was arrested on suspicion of grabbing an 11-year-old girl’s buttocks at Downtown Disney. Jose Angel Pamblanco Morales, 24, of Orlando, was arrested Wednesday on a charge of lewd or lascivious molestation.
According to the Orange County Sheriff’s Office, a complaint about the incident was filed, and a man matching the description of the suspect was located in front of the BET Soundstage Club at Pleasure Island. The girl positively identified Morales, and he was arrested.

Vigilantantis.com

It seems that there’s a very solid logistic built by Disney company, to support children sexual perversion. Each theme facility also has a vast infrastructure underground in order to maintain it. The underground areas contain wardrobe design and repair units, fitting rooms, restrooms, cafeterias, security units, computers, freight ramps, utility encasements, and large connecting tunnels. The underground areas also have human programming rooms. They have their own power plants and water systems and their own police force. Disney company employs 71,000 people at several locations. People are coming and going 24 hours at the Disney theme parks. And the designers behind the cartoons and movies have peculiar techniques to develop their filthy job.

Below, two classic and well known images that expose the way that Disney employees work:

The constant nudity of cartoon characters…

The insertion of real images of nudity in movie frames…

The exposure of female/male genital in specific movie frames.

etc…

Also. the toys/rides of the theme parks also were cruelly developed to pervert children:

Induction to drug consumption also appears to be part of the Disney’s Illuminati agenda:

Below the character “Caterpillar” from the Alice in Wonderland movie is smoking a hookah. A hookah is used for smoking tobacco out of although many use it for other things such as hashish and or opiates..

The purposes of Walt Disney seems pretty clear. His pedophile agenda with an occultist bias was revealed even in his signature:

Jon Stewart continued his coverage of the ‘Ground Zero Mosque’ debate last night, focusing on Fox News’ incongruities harder than he ever has. In a segment called “The Parent Company Trap,” Stewart shared with his viewers how Fox News’ plan to “follow the money” from mosque builder Imam Rauf to terrorists will be a tricky one because it leads right back to Fox News.

Stewart showed clips from his show last week, in which he mocked Fox News for playing a dangerous game of association based on speculation, and wherein Fox continued to mention a nameless man with ties to Imam Rauf through the “Kingdom Foundation.” It turns out the man they are referring to but never name is Saudi prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, one of the biggest shareholders of Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp.

Showing a photo of the prince shaking hands with Rupet Murdoch, Stewart exclaimed, “That’s right, the guy they’re painting as a sinister money force OWNS Fox News.” Stewart then used Fox’s own logic to explain how the “terror mosque” is funded by Prince Alwaleed, despite being a co-owner of Fox News, and therefore funding terrorism. So, using their logic, Stewart said, “If we want to cut off funding to the terror mosque, we must, together as a nation, stop watching Fox.”

But with this new information, one thing is now uncertain. Did Fox actually not know the name of the Kingdom Foundation leader or that he is a News Corp investor? Or did they, as Stewart said, “purposefully cover it up because it didn’t help their fear-driven narrative?”

Stewart turned to John Oliver and Wyatt Cynac to figure out whether Fox is, in fact, evil or stupid?

ARTICLE SOURCE: Huffington Post.com